Horner v. City of Philadelphia

45 A. 330, 194 Pa. 542, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 434
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 5, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 215·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

There was no evidence showing that the fire plug was placed in an unusual position or was of defective structure such as to induce the accident for which this action was brought. It was placed within four inches of the curb, and was of the ordinary diameter. As fire plugs are a clear public necessity, and cannot be placed in the open highway, and as they must be placed in such a position as to bo easily accessible in case of fire, there is no other position for them but on the sidewalks, and it is the universal practice to locate them there. The municipality is the sole authority to determine this matter, and, of course, as we have frequently held, their discretion is not to be held sub[544] ject to the verdicts of juries. The city is under no legal obligation to light its streets, and cannot be held responsible for an alleged insufficiency of light. This whole subject has been so recently considered in the exhaustive opinion of our Brother Dean in the late case of Canavan v. Oil City, 183 Pa. 611, that no further discussion of it is required.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horner v. City of Philadelphia, 45 A. 330, 194 Pa. 542, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 434 (Pa. 1900).

45 A. 330 (Horner v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

David v. Broadway Maintenance Corp.
451 F. Supp. 877 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1978)
WECKSLER v. Philadelphia
115 A.2d 898 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
Dattner v. Lamm
5 Pa. D. & C.2d 552 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
O'Rourke v. Washington City
155 A. 100 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Clinkenbeard v. City of St. Joseph
10 S.W.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
Holmes v. Public Service Commission
79 Pa. Super. 381 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Rollins v. City of Winston-Salem
97 S.E. 211 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1918)
Eichenhofer v. Philadelphia
93 A. 1065 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
McIntyre v. City of Pittsburgh
86 A. 300 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Dondono v. City of Indianapolis
89 N.E. 421 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1909)
Robinson v. Norwood Borough
27 Pa. Super. 481 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Mason v. Philadelphia
54 A. 773 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1903)