Horner v. City of Lee's Summit

Missouri Court of Appeals

Horner v. City of Lee's Summit

384 S.W.3d 357, 2012 WL 4872718, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1312

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. WD 74568·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Caleb Horner (“Horner”) appeals an order denying his motion under Rule 74.06(b) to set aside summary judgment granted in favor of Respondent City of Lee’s Summit (“Lee’s Summit”) alleging excusable neglect arising from confusion over which division of the circuit court in which the case was pending and from personal issues which impeded counsel from filing a proper response. Horner’s attorney’s law license was suspended by the Missouri Supreme Court after the briefs were filed but before the scheduled argument; Horner argued pro se.

AFFIRMED.

Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasoning of the Court has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Caleb Horner (“Horner”) appeals an order denying his motion under Rule 74.06(b) to set aside summary judgment granted in favor of Respondent City of Lee’s Summit (“Lee’s Summit”) alleging excusable neglect arising from confusion over which division of the circuit court in which the case was pending and from personal issues which impeded counsel from filing a proper response. Horner’s attorney’s law license was suspended by the Missouri Supreme Court after the briefs were filed but before the scheduled argument; Horner argued pro se.

AFFIRMED.

Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasoning of the Court has been provided to the parties.

Horner v. City of Lee's Summit, 384 S.W.3d 357, 2012 WL 4872718, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1312 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

384 S.W.3d 357 (Horner v. City of Lee's Summit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.