Horne v. State

624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10030, 1993 WL 382594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Horne v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 623 So. 2d 777
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1993·No. No. 93-0080·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to demonstrate error in the trial court’s concurrent sentences for her convictions of obtaining property by worthless check and battery. The trial court, however, has erred by imposing restitution as a condition of probation in the amount of $309.64 without first determining her ability to pay. See Ward v. State, 511 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Accordingly, the order of restitution is reversed and we remand this case with instructions to conduct an evidentiary hearing concerning appellant’s ability to pay restitution.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, C.J., and GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horne v. State, 624 So. 2d 817, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10030, 1993 WL 382594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

624 So. 2d 817 (Horne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. State
511 So. 2d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)