Horne v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Horne v. State

195 So. 601, 142 Fla. 627, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1427

DecidedApril 16, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 601 (Horne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horne v. State, 195 So. 601, 142 Fla. 627, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1427 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On writ of error to review judgment of conviction of the offense of larceny of a bull calf, plaintiff in error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

The record has been examined and no reversible error is found.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Wi-iitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI