Horne v. State

850 So. 2d 321, 2002 WL 31439693
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 1, 2002·No. 1010796·Published

Opinions

LYONS, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed. See Hale v. State, 848 So.2d 224, 233 (Ala.2002) (holding that “the absence of sentence enhancement allegations from the indictment does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to impose the enhancements” and that because the defendant “did not argue before the trial court at any time that the application of the sentence enhancements violated his rights to due process and to a trial by jury, he ... waived appellate review of [those] arguments”).

WRIT QUASHED.

MOORE, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horne v. State, 850 So. 2d 321, 2002 WL 31439693 (Ala. 2002).

850 So. 2d 321 (Horne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hale v. State
848 So. 2d 224 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2002)