Horne v. Sharpe
This text of 76 S.E. 166 (Horne v. Sharpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence showing that the chattel, the basis of the possessory warrant, had recently been in the quiet, peaceable, and legally acquired possession of the person who sued out the warrant, and the evidence in favor of the defendant, who was found in possession of the chattel in question, being wholly insufficient to rebut tlie evidence establishing the right of the plaintiff to the possession of tlie chattel, a finding for the defendant was unauthorized; and the judge of the superior court erred in overruling the certiorari. Copeland v. Lucas, 6 Ga. App. 7 (64 S. E. 113). .Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 S.E. 166, 11 Ga. App. 783, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horne-v-sharpe-gactapp-1912.