Horne v. McAlpin
57 So. 420, 101 Miss. 129
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This record does not contain the note or either of the accounts attempted to be probated, and consequently we have no means of determining whether they are such claims as could be or have been legally probated.
It follows, therefore, that the decree of the court below must be affirmed. . Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horne v. McAlpin, 57 So. 420, 101 Miss. 129 (Mich. 1911).
57 So. 420 (Horne v. McAlpin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huie v. Lewis
71 So. 2d 498 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
State Ex Rel. Ball v. Robinson
1 So. 2d 621 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Carlton v. Mathews
137 So. 815 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)