Hornburg v. United States

34 Cust. Ct. 435
United States Customs Court·Decided January 12, 1955·No. Reap. Dec. 8382; Entry No. 8491, etc.·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hornburg v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 435 (cusc 1955).

34 Cust. Ct. 435 (Hornburg v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.