Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa

1920 OK 329, 192 P. 1093, 79 Okla. 261, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 88

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 12, 1920

Docket9768

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1920 OK 329 (Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa, 1920 OK 329, 192 P. 1093, 79 Okla. 261, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 88 (Okla. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

*262 RAINEY, C. J.

This cause was submitted in its regular order on June 8, 1920, and plaintiffs in error given 30 days from that date to file briefs. On July 13, 1920, plaintiffs in error were given 60 days’ additional time to file briefs as per a stipulation filed July 6, 1920, This time having expired, and • no briefs having been filed, nor further extension of time requested, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pac. 880; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; Sequoyah Club v. Ward, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747; Cantwell et al. v. Patterson et al., 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 755; Guarantee State Bank v. Turner, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 790.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*262 RAINEY, C. J.

This cause was submitted in its regular order on June 8, 1920, and plaintiffs in error given 30 days from that date to file briefs. On July 13, 1920, plaintiffs in error were given 60 days’ additional time to file briefs as per a stipulation filed July 6, 1920, This time having expired, and • no briefs having been filed, nor further extension of time requested, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pac. 880; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; Sequoyah Club v. Ward, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747; Cantwell et al. v. Patterson et al., 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 755; Guarantee State Bank v. Turner, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 790.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK 329, 192 P. 1093, 79 Okla. 261, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hornaday-v-bank-of-commerce-of-sapulpa-okla-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack