Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa

1920 OK 329, 192 P. 1093, 79 Okla. 261, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 88
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 12, 1920·No. 9768·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*262 RAINEY, C. J.

This cause was submitted in its regular order on June 8, 1920, and plaintiffs in error given 30 days from that date to file briefs. On July 13, 1920, plaintiffs in error were given 60 days’ additional time to file briefs as per a stipulation filed July 6, 1920, This time having expired, and • no briefs having been filed, nor further extension of time requested, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Blanlot v. Carbon Coal Co., 76 Okla. 16, 183 Pac. 880; Balch v. Pickard, 72 Oklahoma, 179 Pac. 10; Sequoyah Club v. Ward, 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 747; Cantwell et al. v. Patterson et al., 71 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 755; Guarantee State Bank v. Turner, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 790.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa, 1920 OK 329, 192 P. 1093, 79 Okla. 261, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 88 (Okla. 1920).

1920 OK 329 (Hornaday v. Bank of Commerce of Sapulpa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gummere v. Coles
1923 OK 48 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
City of Enid v. Davis
1922 OK 152 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)