Horn v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2024-2578
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III, Petitioner, v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
February 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion to dismiss/suppress search and seizure, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Luther Arthur Horn, III, pro se, Petitioner. Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horn v. State of Florida (Horn v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.