Horn v. State of Florida
This text of Horn v. State of Florida (Horn v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-2578 _____________________________
LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
February 12, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion to dismiss/suppress search and seizure, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Luther Arthur Horn, III, pro se, Petitioner.
Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horn v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.