Horn v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 12, 2025·No. 1D2024-2578·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-2578

LUTHER ARTHUR HORN, III, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

February 12, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion to dismiss/suppress search and seizure, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Luther Arthur Horn, III, pro se, Petitioner. Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horn v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Horn v. State of Florida (Horn v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.