Horn v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Horn v. State

117 So. 286, 217 Ala. 677, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 99

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 7, 1928

Docket4 Div. 388.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 117 So. 286 (Horn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horn v. State, 117 So. 286, 217 Ala. 677, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 99 (Ala. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The correct practice would seem to have required the solicitor to file a complaint following the charge made in the original affidavit, and on this complaint, though severance had been granted to this appellant, both defendants could have been separately tried.

Offenses of this character are several as well as joint, and one defendant may be convicted and the other acquitted. Therefore the failure of the solicitor to file a complaint charging the defendants jointly relieved the state of none of its burdens, and imposed on the defendant no great burden. Crawford v. State, 112 Ala. 1, 21 So. 214; White v. State, 12 Ala. App. 160, 68 So. 521.

In the light of this rule of law and the facts stated in the opinion showing that the evidence offered related only to the offense as charged in the original affidavit, the Court of Appeals properly applied the doctrine of error without injury. ,

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI