Horn v. Horn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horn v. Horn

199 A.D.2d 241, 605 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11320

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 241 (Horn v. Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horn v. Horn, 199 A.D.2d 241, 605 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11320 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered August 28, 1991, as, inter alia, provided for the distribution of marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when, presented with conflicting expert opinions as to the value of the defendant’s chiropractic license, it chose one expert’s opinion over that of the other (see, Bugliari v Bugliari, 169 AD2d 697; Ritz v Ritz, 166 AD2d 568; Holihan v Holihan, 159 AD2d 685).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), entered August 28, 1991, as, inter alia, provided for the distribution of marital property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when, presented with conflicting expert opinions as to the value of the defendant’s chiropractic license, it chose one expert’s opinion over that of the other (see, Bugliari v Bugliari, 169 AD2d 697; Ritz v Ritz, 166 AD2d 568; Holihan v Holihan, 159 AD2d 685).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 241, 605 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-horn-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack