Horn v. Haverfield Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Horn v. Haverfield Corp.

585 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9951, 1991 WL 193118

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 1, 1991

DocketNo. 91-1280

StatusPublished

This text of 585 So. 2d 1203 (Horn v. Haverfield Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horn v. Haverfield Corp., 585 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9951, 1991 WL 193118 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an injunctive order enforcing a restrictive covenant. We need not determine whether the amendment to § 542.33(2)(a) should be applied in the enforcement of a contract entered into before its effective date or whether we should follow the majority or the dissenting opinion in Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc., 579 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), because, on any standard, there is no error or abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an injunctive order enforcing a restrictive covenant. We need not determine whether the amendment to § 542.33(2)(a) should be applied in the enforcement of a contract entered into before its effective date or whether we should follow the majority or the dissenting opinion in Hapney v. Central Garage, Inc., 579 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), because, on any standard, there is no error or abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

585 So. 2d 1203, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9951, 1991 WL 193118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-haverfield-corp-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack