Horn v. Grand Rapids Fire Insurance
This text of 83 N.W. 1118 (Horn v. Grand Rapids Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The same question as to the propriety of the service of summons upon the local agent is presented in this case as in Baldinger v. Rockford Insurance Company, infra, page 147, and is ruled by the decision in that case.
The objection by defendant that costs allowed on motion in this case were taxed and inserted in the final judgment, rather than by entry of separate judgment, is of no merit whatever. The course adopted by the plaintiff in this respect was approved by this court in Wentworth v. Grriggs, 24 Minn. 450.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 N.W. 1118, 80 Minn. 146, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-grand-rapids-fire-insurance-minn-1900.