Horn v. Georgia Fertilizer & Oil Co.

88 S.E. 991, 18 Ga. App. 35, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 97
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 1, 1916
Docket6645
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 991 (Horn v. Georgia Fertilizer & Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horn v. Georgia Fertilizer & Oil Co., 88 S.E. 991, 18 Ga. App. 35, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 97 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The vendor of a personal chattel who has reserved title therein can not, by retaking the property upon an agreement of the vendee to rescind the sale, cut off rights of third persons which have intervened. • The contract of conditional sale must be enforced in accordance with the provisions of the statute, in order that the rights of third persons which have attached to the vendee’s equity in the property may not be injuriously affected.

2. The evidence authox-ized the vei’dict, and there was no eri’or in x-efusing the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 991, 18 Ga. App. 35, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-georgia-fertilizer-oil-co-gactapp-1916.