Horn v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Horn v. Davis

25 A. 828, 155 Pa. 57, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1184

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 16, 1893

DocketAppeal, No. 359

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A. 828 (Horn v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horn v. Davis, 25 A. 828, 155 Pa. 57, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1184 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The papers referred to in the first, second and third specifications of error were properly admitted in evidence for the purpose of showing title in the plaintiff. The third specification, which alleges error in a portion of the charge of the court, is not sustained. There was abundance of evidence to show a conversion of the piano by the defendant, and, under the lease or agreement between Albrecht & Co. and the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover in this form of action.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The papers referred to in the first, second and third specifications of error were properly admitted in evidence for the purpose of showing title in the plaintiff. The third specification, which alleges error in a portion of the charge of the court, is not sustained. There was abundance of evidence to show a conversion of the piano by the defendant, and, under the lease or agreement between Albrecht & Co. and the defendant, the plaintiff was entitled to recover in this form of action.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A. 828, 155 Pa. 57, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-davis-pa-1893.