Horn v. Chicago

338 U.S. 940, 70 S. Ct. 429
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 16, 1950
DocketNo. 472
StatusPublished

This text of 338 U.S. 940 (Horn v. Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horn v. Chicago, 338 U.S. 940, 70 S. Ct. 429 (1950).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want [941]*941of jurisdiction. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by 28 U. S. C. § 2103, certiorari is denied.

Lloyd Lanham for appellants. Benjamin S. Adamowski, L. Louis Karton and Arthur Magid for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State courts; certiorari
28 U.S.C. § 1257(2)
§ 2103
28 U.S.C. § 2103

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 U.S. 940, 70 S. Ct. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-v-chicago-scotus-1950.