Horn Maintenance Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

225 A.D.2d 443, 639 N.Y.2d 355
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 443 (Horn Maintenance Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horn Maintenance Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 225 A.D.2d 443, 639 N.Y.2d 355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[444]*444The motion court erred in granting summary judgment to SIF and Basonas in the declaratory judgment action and, consequently, its reliance on that determination in granting summary judgment and dismissing the third-party complaint in the personal injury action was also error.

Basonas and SIF as summary judgment movants failed to demonstrate that they were entitled to judgment as á matter of law on the issue of whether Horn was covered as an additional insured under Basonas’ policy with Aetna. A certificate of insurance is merely evidence of a contract for insurance, not conclusive proof that the contract exists, and not, in and of itself, a contract to insure (Morrison-Knudsen Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 181 AD2d 500; Bucon, Inc. v Pennsylvania Mfg. Assn. Ins. Co., 151 AD2d 207, 210). On summary judgment, a certificate may be sufficient to raise an issue of fact, especially where additional factors exist favoring coverage (see, Morrison-Knudsen Co. v Continental Cas. Co., supra; Bucon, Inc. v Pennsylvania Mfg. Assn. Ins. Co., supra), but it is not sufficient, standing alone as it does here, to prove coverage as a matter of law.

Basonas’ and SIF’s failure to carry their burden as summary judgment movants mandated that the motion be denied. As a result, Horn’s further contentions refuting coverage need not be addressed. Basonas’ additional contentions as to the coverage issue are without merit.

As noted, the summary dismissal of Horn’s indemnification claim, based upon the erroneous determination as to coverage, was also error. Consequently, we hold that the determination as to whether the anti-subrogation rule is applicable to bar Horn from seeking contractual indemnification from Basonas as a matter of law must await a proper resolution of the coverage question (see, Wright v McCann & Son, 216 AD2d 73). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ambrose v. City Univ. Constr. Fund
2026 NY Slip Op 30994(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Lopez v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.
298 F. Supp. 3d 503 (E.D. New York, 2018)
Prevost v. One City Block LLC
2017 NY Slip Op 8303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Shoup v. Union Security Life Insurance
124 P.3d 1028 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2005)
Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
22 A.D.3d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Insurance Corp. v. U.S. Underwriters Insurance
11 A.D.3d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
CITIGROUP, INC. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
336 F. Supp. 2d 282 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Balanca v. M. Foschi & Sons, Inc.
302 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Trapani v. 10 Arial Way Associates
301 A.D.2d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
DiMaggio v. Chase Manhattan Bank
266 A.D.2d 89 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
New York City Transit Authority v. Firemen's Fund Insurance
251 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Home Insurance
251 A.D.2d 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Buccini v. 1568 Broadway Associates
250 A.D.2d 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 443, 639 N.Y.2d 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-maintenance-corp-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-nyappdiv-1996.