Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih

Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih

727 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1404, 1999 WL 69615
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 1999·No. No. 97-2904·Published

Opinion

BENTON, J.

Since the judge of compensation claims reserved jurisdiction to decide if an additional award for attendant care should be awarded for care needed during the same periods of time for which the award under review was made, we dismiss the appeal on the authority of Emro Marketing v. Schwier, 670 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). See Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Southern Wine & [1017] Spirits, Inc. v. Hernandez, 442 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

BOOTH and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih, 727 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1404, 1999 WL 69615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

727 So. 2d 1016 (Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S. WINE & SPIRITS, INC. v. Hernandez
442 So. 2d 1061 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
693 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Emro Marketing v. Schwier
670 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Town of Palm Beach v. Watts
426 So. 2d 1312 (First Circuit, 1982)