Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih
This text of 727 So. 2d 1016 (Horn & Hardart of Florida, Inc. v. Sayih) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the judge of compensation claims reserved jurisdiction to decide if an additional award for attendant care should be awarded for care needed during the same periods of time for which the award under review was made, we dismiss the appeal on the authority of Emro Marketing v. Schwier, 670 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). See Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680, 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Southern Wine & [1017]*1017Spirits, Inc. v. Hernandez, 442 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Town of Palm Beach v. Watts, 426 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
727 So. 2d 1016, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1404, 1999 WL 69615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horn-hardart-of-florida-inc-v-sayih-fladistctapp-1999.