Hormaza v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

193 So. 3d 24, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4865, 2016 WL 1239623
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 30, 2016·No. No. 3D15-1291·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 627.409(1), Fla. Stat. (2011); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins, Co. v. Kramer, 725 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also Rappaport v. Progressive Express Ins. Co., 972 So.2d 970 (Fla, 8d DCA 2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hormaza v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 193 So. 3d 24, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4865, 2016 WL 1239623 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

193 So. 3d 24 (Hormaza v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rappaport v. PROGRESSIVE EXP. INS. CO.
972 So. 2d 970 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Kramer
725 So. 2d 1141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)