Horlas v. Robinson
426 F. App'x 478
This text of 426 F. App'x 478 (Horlas v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Horlas v. Robinson, 426 F. App'x 478 (8th Cir. 2011).
Opinion
Iowa inmate Michael Eugene Horlas appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. We conclude dismissal was proper because the district court did not err in holding that Horlas did not comply with Fed.R.CivP. 11(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
426 F. App'x 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horlas-v-robinson-ca8-2011.