Horlas v. Robinson

Eighth Circuit

Horlas v. Robinson

426 F. App'x 478

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2011·No. No. 11-2232·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Michael Eugene Horlas appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. We conclude dismissal was proper because the district court did not err in holding that Horlas did not comply with Fed.R.CivP. 11(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Michael Eugene Horlas appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice. We conclude dismissal was proper because the district court did not err in holding that Horlas did not comply with Fed.R.CivP. 11(a). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Horlas v. Robinson, 426 F. App'x 478 (8th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

426 F. App'x 478 (Horlas v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related