Horgan v. Schultheis Fort George Casino

30 Misc. 837, 61 N.Y.S. 1138
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 837 (Horgan v. Schultheis Fort George Casino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horgan v. Schultheis Fort George Casino, 30 Misc. 837, 61 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The rental value of the tools rented to defendant by plaintiff was a question of fact for the jury.

The verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $200 was not excessive.

The evidence submitted by plaintiff amply sustains their conclusion. Eo substantial evidence was offered by defendant, respecting such rental value or disputing plaintiff’s estimate of the same.

[838]*838The verdict of the jury in view of this fact was certainly just and reasonable, they having awarded plaintiff. only $200, when his claim was far over $500.

No error was committed, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., and Schuchman, J.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 837, 61 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horgan-v-schultheis-fort-george-casino-nynyccityct-1899.