Hores v. State of New York

212 A.D.2d 581, 623 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1534
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from (1) an order and judgment (one paper) of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated November 25, 1992, which, after a trial on the issue of liability, granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the claim on the merits, and (2) an order of the same court, dated March 3, 1992, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) to vacate the order and judgment.

Ordered that the appeal from the order and judgment is dismissed, as the order and judgment was superseded by the order dated March 3, 1992; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated March 3, 1992, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

We find no basis to disturb the trial court’s conclusion that the respondent was not liable under the circumstances of this case. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hores v. State of New York, 212 A.D.2d 581, 623 N.Y.S.2d 134, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 581 (Hores v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SHAW, MARK ALLEN v. VANARSDALE, CHESTER
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Shaw v. VanArsdale
138 A.D.3d 1411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)