Horen v. Horen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Horen v. Horen

100 A.D.2d 894, 474 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18017

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 1984·Published

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), entered February 22, 1983, as directed the husband to pay counsel fees in the amount of $1,500 to the wife’s attorney. H Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing the counsel fee awarded to $2,500. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. H We find that on the record before us the counsel fee award-was inadequate to the extent indicated. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the appeal, as limited by the appellant’s brief, is from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Vitale, J.), entered February 22, 1983, as directed the husband to pay counsel fees in the amount of $1,500 to the wife’s attorney. H Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing the counsel fee awarded to $2,500. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. H We find that on the record before us the counsel fee award-was inadequate to the extent indicated. Brown, J. P., Niehoff, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Horen v. Horen, 100 A.D.2d 894, 474 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

100 A.D.2d 894 (Horen v. Horen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.