Hordes v. J.I. Kislak, Inc.
162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 413, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 380
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubisupra. For affirmance — TRENCHARD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 6.
For reversal — PARKER, VAN BUSKIRK, KERNEY, JJ. 3. *Page 414
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hordes v. J.I. Kislak, Inc., 162 A. 582, 109 N.J.L. 413, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 380 (N.J. 1932).
162 A. 582 (Hordes v. J.I. Kislak, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. Essex National Trunk, C., Co., Inc.
194 A. 622 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)