Horan v. Town of Brookhaven

29 A.D.2d 563, 286 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2619
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1967·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, as amended by order of said court dated March 31, 1967, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and without prejudice to any remedies which may remain to the parties. Where change of substance in the judgment is sought, the remedy is an appeal or motion to vacate, not a motion to amend the judgment (Herpe V. Herpe, 225 N. V. 323 ; 9 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 63:157). However, in the exercise of our appellate jurisdiction, we now do what the lower court should have done (Matter of James, 23 A D 2d 529; Terry & Gibson V. Bank of N. T. & Trust Co., 242 App. Div. 699) and treat defendants’ cross motion as one to vacate that part of the original judgment which decreed that respondents build the boardwalk, and, as such, grant the motion. Beldock, P." J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horan v. Town of Brookhaven, 29 A.D.2d 563, 286 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

29 A.D.2d 563 (Horan v. Town of Brookhaven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maio v. Maio
151 A.D.2d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Board of Trustees v. W. Wilton Wood, Inc.
97 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Jones v. Maphey
409 N.E.2d 939 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Chemical Bank v. Buxbaum
76 A.D.2d 850 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)