Horan v. Frangella

32 A.D.2d 850, 300 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The petition for opportunity to ballot was properly rejected by Special Term on account of the insufficiency of the authenticating statements. A statement of the present address of the subscribing witness, as well as the date and place of last registration, is required (Matter of Lerner v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 450; Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N. Y. 620; Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329). Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horan v. Frangella, 32 A.D.2d 850, 300 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

32 A.D.2d 850 (Horan v. Frangella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Lerner v. Cohen
187 N.E. 635 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen
23 N.E.2d 81 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)
Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen
198 N.E. 523 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)