Horan v. Frangella
This text of 32 A.D.2d 850 (Horan v. Frangella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The petition for opportunity to ballot was properly rejected by Special Term on account of the insufficiency of the authenticating statements. A statement of the present address of the subscribing witness, as well as the date and place of last registration, is required (Matter of Lerner v. Cohen, 262 N. Y. 450; Matter of Dorsey v. Cohen, 268 N. Y. 620; Matter of Crosbie v. Cohen, 281 N. Y. 329). Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.2d 850, 300 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horan-v-frangella-nyappdiv-1969.