HORACIO SEQUEIRA v. GATE SAFE INC.
This text of HORACIO SEQUEIRA v. GATE SAFE INC. (HORACIO SEQUEIRA v. GATE SAFE INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-0487 Lower Tribunal Nos. 19-0148AP, 16-18839SP ________________
Horacio Sequeira, Appellant,
vs.
Gate Safe, Inc., Appellee.
An appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Christina Marie DiRaimondo, Judge.
Horacio Sequeira, in proper person.
Littler Mendelson, P.C., Ryan P. Forrest, and Courtney B. Wilson, for appellee.
Before SCALES, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ultra Aviation Servs., Inc. v. Clemente, 272 So. 3d
426, 428 n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“Section 218.077(2) of the Florida
Statutes is a preemption statute that expressly prohibits political
subdivisions of the state from establishing a minimum wage contrary to
state or federal wage requirements.”); see also Valderrama v. Portfolio
Recovery Assocs., LLC, 972 So. 2d 239, 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“A
movant for summary judgment has the initial burden of demonstrating the
nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact.”) (emphasis added)
(quoting Landers v. Milton, 370 So. 2d 368, 370 (Fla. 1979)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
HORACIO SEQUEIRA v. GATE SAFE INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horacio-sequeira-v-gate-safe-inc-fladistctapp-2021.