Horacio Munoz Tena v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

501 F. App'x 694
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 2012
Docket08-74714
StatusUnpublished

This text of 501 F. App'x 694 (Horacio Munoz Tena v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Horacio Munoz Tena v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 501 F. App'x 694 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM *

Juan Reyes Perez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision ordering him removed for alien smuggling. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition. 1

Assuming that Reyes’s testimony was credible, immigration officers’ threats that Reyes would be deported or imprisoned if he did not admit the charges were coercive, and his inculpatory statements should have been excluded. Bong Youn Choy v. Barber, 279 F.2d 642, 647 (9th Cir.1960) (suppressing as involuntary an alien’s statement “obtained by the government by inducing fear through official threats of prosecution”). Nevertheless, substantial evidence supports the agency’s alternative holding that Reyes is removable due to alien smuggling even excluding his coerced statements. The record reflects that, when immigration officers asked for identification for Reyes’s undocumented niece at primary inspection, Reyes gave the immigration officer his daughter’s birth certificate, in an attempt to provide the identification necessary to allow the niece to cross the border. This affirmative act is sufficient to establish the elements of Reyes’s smuggling charge. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i); Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 1204, 1208-09 (9th Cir.2008).

PETITION DENIED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. We grant Reyes’s motion to file a substitute brief. The substitute brief received on December 3, 2012 is deemed filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
501 F. App'x 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horacio-munoz-tena-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2012.