Horacio Cruz Amaya v. L.A. Martinez

District Court, C.D. California·Decided November 29, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00559·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HORACIO CRUZ AMAYA, also Case No. 2:23-cv-00559-WLH-SSC known as AARON ROJAS, ORDER ACCEPTING Petitioner, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF v. UNITED STATES DENYING CERTIFICATE OF Respondent. APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a 1 court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of 2 appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 22538(c)(2); 3 Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); 4 Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 5 6 DATED: 11/29/2023 4] ag. — St 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Horacio Cruz Amaya v. L.A. Martinez, (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Horacio Cruz Amaya v. L.A. Martinez (Horacio Cruz Amaya v. L.A. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Slack v. McDaniel
529 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)