Horaces Bridges v. Lannette Linthicum
This text of Horaces Bridges v. Lannette Linthicum (Horaces Bridges v. Lannette Linthicum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-18-00262-CV Style: Horaces Bridges v. v. Lannette Linthicum Date motion filed*: May 11, 2018 Type of motion: Statement of Inability to afford costs Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ We strike appellant’s Statement of Inability to Afford Costs because said motion is deficient for failing to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k). The Court will consider an amended Statement of Inability to afford costs that is handwritten, but it must produce a distinct black image. See id. 9.4(a). The amended statement is due in this Court within 45 days from the date of this order.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting for the Court
Panel consists of ____________________________________________
Date: June 7, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Horaces Bridges v. Lannette Linthicum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horaces-bridges-v-lannette-linthicum-texapp-2018.