Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.

341 F.2d 579, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1965

Docket21199_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 F.2d 579 (Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc., 341 F.2d 579, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant here complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we are in agreement with the District Court that there was no genuine issue for trial and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant here complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we are in agreement with the District Court that there was no genuine issue for trial and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 F.2d 579, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horace-thomas-v-rich-plan-of-east-louisiana-inc-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack