Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.

341 F.2d 579, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1965·No. 21199_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant here complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we are in agreement with the District Court that there was no genuine issue for trial and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant here complains of the action of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in granting the appellee’s motion for summary judgment. After reviewing the record, we are in agreement with the District Court that there was no genuine issue for trial and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.

Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc., 341 F.2d 579, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6688 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

341 F.2d 579 (Horace Thomas v. Rich Plan of East Louisiana, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related