Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Westenfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Westenfield

496 N.W.2d 410, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 193, 1993 WL 84936

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 16, 1993

DocketC5-92-792

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 496 N.W.2d 410 (Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Westenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horace Mann Insurance Company v. Westenfield, 496 N.W.2d 410, 1993 Minn. LEXIS 193, 1993 WL 84936 (Mich. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Company for further review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted, the decision is reversed and the judgment entered in the trial court in favor of the petitioner Minnesota Mutual is reinstated.

MEMORANDUM

The decision of the court of appeals has confused and therefore misapplied principles of No-Fault first-party coverage to *411 this question which only involves third-party liability coverage. Our decision in West Bend Mutual Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee Mutual Ins. Co., 384 N.W.2d 877 (Minn.1986) is controlling and dispositive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI