Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas

DecidedNovember 21, 2001

Docket13-01-00302-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas (Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-01-302-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

HORACE LAMAR WATKINS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197^th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, HORACE LAMAR WATKINS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order denying second motion to set aside sentence entered by the 197^th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause no. 90-CR-814-C.

Upon review of the notice of appeal and documents filed by appellant, it appeared that an appeal was not timely perfected and, further, that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if this defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s notice, the appeal would be dismissed. On May 23, 2001, appellant filed a motion to perfect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to perfect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant=s motion to perfect is DENIED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21^st day of November, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-01-302-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

HORACE LAMAR WATKINS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197^th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N

Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, HORACE LAMAR WATKINS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order denying second motion to set aside sentence entered by the 197^th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause no. 90-CR-814-C.

Upon review of the notice of appeal and documents filed by appellant, it appeared that an appeal was not timely perfected and, further, that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if this defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s notice, the appeal would be dismissed. On May 23, 2001, appellant filed a motion to perfect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to perfect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant=s motion to perfect is DENIED. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21^st day of November, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horace-lamar-watkins-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2001.