Horace Ingram v. United States
299 F.2d 351, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5866
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 19, 1962·No. 19199·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
IT APPEARING that the grounds asserted by the appellant for reversing the trial court’s dismissal of the Section 2255 motion were all apparent at the time the original appeal from conviction was taken, and they are not such as may be attacked under Section 2255, the judgment of the trial court is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horace Ingram v. United States, 299 F.2d 351, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5866 (5th Cir. 1962).
299 F.2d 351 (Horace Ingram v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Grasso
468 F. Supp. 264 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
Floyd Herman Randall v. United States
454 F.2d 1132 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Battaglia v. United States
311 F. Supp. 1126 (D. Arizona, 1968)
Smith v. United States
277 F. Supp. 850 (D. Maryland, 1967)
Joe Delegal v. United States
363 F.2d 433 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
Eddie Griffin v. United States
352 F.2d 307 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Juan Jose Medrano v. United States
315 F.2d 361 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)