Horace E. Lee v. United States
220 F.2d 384
Opinion
A jury in the United States District Court found Horace E. Lee guilty of armed robbery. On this appeal he complains that his cross-examination of Government witnesses was improperly restricted and that the trial court erred in not giving to the jury instructions which he did not request. In our opinion his complaints are not well-founded.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Horace E. Lee v. United States, 220 F.2d 384 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
220 F.2d 384 (Horace E. Lee v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.