Horace E. Lee v. United States
220 F.2d 384
This text of 220 F.2d 384 (Horace E. Lee v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Horace E. Lee v. United States, 220 F.2d 384 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
Opinion
A jury in the United States District Court found Horace E. Lee guilty of armed robbery. On this appeal he complains that his cross-examination of Government witnesses was improperly restricted and that the trial court erred in not giving to the jury instructions which he did not request. In our opinion his complaints are not well-founded.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
220 F.2d 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/horace-e-lee-v-united-states-cadc-1955.