Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hoque v. City of New York

Hoque v. City of New York

185 A.D.2d 874, 587 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10010
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 17, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 185 A.D.2d 874 (Hoque v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoque v. City of New York, 185 A.D.2d 874, 587 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated September 6, 1990, which denied his motion for a default judgment against the defendant Zaffuto Construction Co., Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was not entitled to a default judgment as the motion papers in support of his application were defective (see, Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joosten v. Gale
129 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
185 A.D.2d 874, 587 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoque-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1992.