Hopwah v. Hopwah

254 A.D.2d 226, 678 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11390

Opinion

Order of disposition, Fam[227] ily Court, Bronx Comity (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about October 2, 1996, granting petitioner a two-year order of protection, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent had menaced petitioner with a gun and threatened to harm her children, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Family Court’s inquiry respecting respondent’s mid-trial application to proceed pro se was a proper exercise of discretion given respondent’s failure to advise the court more clearly of his wish to represent himself (see, People v Rheubottom, 131 AD2d 790).

We have considered respondent’s remaining contention and find that it is unavailing. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopwah v. Hopwah, 254 A.D.2d 226, 678 N.Y.S.2d 893, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 226 (Hopwah v. Hopwah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rheubottom
131 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)