Hopson v. State

20 S.W.2d 199, 113 Tex. Crim. 261, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 617
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hopson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 Tex. Crim. 260
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 22, 1929·No. No. 12571.·Published

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing a still and equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

In this case the motion for new trial was overruled November 15, 1928, and notice of appeal then given. Art. 760 of our 1925 C. C. P., provides, in terms, that extension or grant of time for filing statement of facts or bills of exception “Shall not be so extended as to delay the filing thereof within ninety days from the date the notice of appeal is given.” Neither trial courts nor this court have power to override the plain letter of the statute. In this case the statement of facts was filed March 11, 1929, and the bills of exception March 5, 1929. Same were filed long after the time allowed by law. They can not be considered by us. The indictment correctly charges the offense, and is followed by the court’s charge, the judgment and sentence.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopson v. State, 20 S.W.2d 199, 113 Tex. Crim. 261, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 617 (Tex. 1929).

20 S.W.2d 199 (Hopson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. State
171 S.W. 729 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Reeves v. State
4 S.W.2d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Bundick v. State
127 S.W. 543 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Hanks v. State
269 S.W. 106 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)