Hopson v. State
832 S.W.2d 337, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 1992 WL 166080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hopson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 811 S.W.2d 868 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. It was denied as a successive motion prohibited by Rule 24.035(k). Mov-ant had filed a previous Rule 24.035 motion concerning the same convictions. He unsuccessfully appealed the denial of this previous motion. Hopson v. State, 811 S.W.2d 868 (Mo.App.1991). The motion court’s ruling was correct. We affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hopson v. State, 832 S.W.2d 337, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1233, 1992 WL 166080 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
832 S.W.2d 337 (Hopson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hopson v. State
811 S.W.2d 868 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1991)