Hopson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

E.D. California

Hopson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 19, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00880·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNTHIA HOPSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00880-AWI-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 14] J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., et al, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 26) This action was filed on June 25, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. ECF No. 26.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ng | Dated: _ January 19, 2021 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYNTHIA HOPSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00880-AWI-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 14] J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., et al, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 26) This action was filed on June 25, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2021, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. ECF No. 26.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ng | Dated: _ January 19, 2021 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Hopson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Pincite

Hopson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (Hopson v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related