Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Property Cas. Corp.

2022 TN WC 41
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMay 11, 2022
Docket2021-08-0074
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 TN WC 41 (Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Property Cas. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Property Cas. Corp., 2022 TN WC 41 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2022).

Opinion

FILED May 11, 2022 07:09 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

CECILIA HOPSON, ) Docket No. 2021-08-0074 Employee, ) v. ) TRAVELERS PROPERTY CAS. ) CORP., ) State File No. 76850-2014 Employer, ) And ) NEW HAMPSHIRE INS. CO., ) Carrier. ) Judge Deana Seymour

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court heard Travelers’ Motion for Summary Judgment on May 9, 2022. Travelers contends Ms. Hopson filed her Petition for Benefit Determination outside the one-year statute of limitations. For the reasons below, the Court grants the motion.

Facts

Ms. Hopson claimed injuries after an automobile accident at work on September 24, 2014. After reporting the accident, she received authorized treatment for headaches and neck and back pain from multiple physicians.

These physicians treated Ms. Hopson conservatively and placed her at maximum medical improvement from an orthopedic, neurologic, and neurosurgical standpoint. Dr. Bola Adamolekun, one of Ms. Hopson’s neurologists, noted that he could not relate her symptoms to her work accident.

After her release from Dr. Adamolekun on December 6, 2018, Ms. Hopson requested additional medical treatment. However, Travelers denied the request based on Dr. Adamolekun’s causation opinion. The last payment on the claim was made on December 21, 2018, and a Notice of Controversy was issued in February 2019. Ms. Hopson did not file a Petition for Benefit Determination until January 20, 2021.

1 Travelers’ Motion

Travelers filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, along with a statement of undisputed material facts. The Court summarizes the material facts as follows:

• Ms. Hopson seeks benefits arising out of an incident at work on September 24, 2014; • Travelers’ last payment on the claim was made on December 21, 2018; and • Ms. Hopson filed her petition on January 20, 2021.

Travelers contends it is entitled to summary judgment because Ms. Hopson waited more than one year after Travelers’ last payment before filing her petition, thus falling outside the one-year statute of limitations in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203(b)(2) (2014).

Although Ms. Hopson filed medical records, medical bills, and emails related to her claim, she did not respond to the motion as required by Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 56.03.

Analysis

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04.

As the moving party, Travelers must do one of two things to prevail on its motion: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Ms. Hopson’s claim, or (2) demonstrate that her evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of her claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Travelers is successful in meeting this burden, Ms. Hopson must then establish that the record contains specific facts upon which the Court could base a decision in her favor. Id. at 265.

Since Ms. Hopson did not respond to Travelers’ statement of undisputed facts, the Court finds the motion and the facts undisputed. The issue then is whether summary judgment is “appropriate” under Rule 56.06.

Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203, an employee’s right to recover compensation is forever barred unless the employee files a petition within one year after the accident resulting in injury. The statute of limitations can be extended by payments made on the claim. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2). According to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203(c), “the issuing date of the last payment of compensation by the employer, not the date of its receipt, shall constitute the time the employer ceased making payments.”

2 In a similar case, the Appeals Board affirmed the trial court’s order for summary judgment where the employee filed her Petition for Benefit Determination more than one year following the last voluntary payment on the claim. Hancock v. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Ctr., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *7-8 (Jan. 5, 2022). The Board concluded that the employer negated an essential element of the employee’s claim and demonstrated that the employee’s evidence was insufficient to establish an essential element of her claim. Id.

Here, the undisputed facts conclusively show that a petition was not filed until January 20, 2021, which was more than one year from Travelers’ last payment on December 21, 2018. Thus, Travelers met its burden of negating an essential element of the claim – filing within a year of the last paid benefit.

The burden shifts to Ms. Hopson to show that the record contains specific facts upon which the Court could find a factual dispute on that issue. Since Ms. Hopson did not provide these facts, the Court holds that Travelers is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Traveler’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Ms. Hopson’s claim is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final thirty days after entry.

3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to Travelers under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06 (February, 2022), payable to the Clerk within five days of this order becoming final.

4. Travelers shall prepare and submit the SD-2 with the Clerk within ten days of the date of judgment.

ENTERED May 11, 2022.

_______________________________________ Judge Deana C. Seymour Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on May 11, 2022. Name Certified First Email Service sent to: Mail Class Mail Cecilia Hopson, X X X 9432 Mary Tucker Cove Employee Memphis, TN 38133 chopson21@comcast.net Emily Faulkner, X emily.faulkner@mgclaw.com Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________ Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4 Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal: If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.
477 S.W.3d 235 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 TN WC 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopson-cecilia-v-travelers-property-cas-corp-tennworkcompcl-2022.