Hoppock v. Chambers

56 N.W. 86, 96 Mich. 509, 1893 Mich. LEXIS 807
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 25, 1893·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

McGrath, J.

This is a bill by certain tax-payers of the [510] village of Frankfort against tbe trustees and officers of said village, to restrain tbe payment of moneys under a contract entered into in May, 1890, by the council, with George L. Davis, trustee, for a water supply to said village. After the execution of said contract a corporation was formed, which succeeded to all the rights of said George L. Davis under said contract.

The bill, is fatally defective, in that neither said Davis nor said corporation, so succeeding to his rights, is made a party defendant thereto. All the parties in interest, and whose rights may be affected, ought to be made parties. Jenn. Oh. Pr. 21, 22; Puter. PI. & Pr. (Mich.) 37. The other parties to the contract in question would not be concluded by any decree herein, and the village, in case of a decree against it, would be subject-to still further litigation.

The decree of the court below, dismissing the bill, is affirmed, with costs to defendants.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoppock v. Chambers, 56 N.W. 86, 96 Mich. 509, 1893 Mich. LEXIS 807 (Mich. 1893).

56 N.W. 86 (Hoppock v. Chambers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Royce v. Public Utility District No. 1
175 P.2d 624 (Washington Supreme Court, 1946)
Fischer v. Marsh
202 N.W. 422 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1925)
Page v. Town of Gallup
191 P. 460 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1920)
Walrath v. Board of County Commissioners
18 N.M. 101 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1913)
Stallcup v. City of Tacoma
42 P. 541 (Washington Supreme Court, 1895)