Hoppl v. Hoppl
359 N.E.2d 700, 40 N.Y.2d 993, 391 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3186
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that, upon this record and the reasons assigned by the Appellate Division, the court does not find any abuse of discretion as a matter of law. Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoppl v. Hoppl, 359 N.E.2d 700, 40 N.Y.2d 993, 391 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3186 (N.Y. 1976).
359 N.E.2d 700 (Hoppl v. Hoppl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Calkins v. Calkins
309 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
McGrath v. McGrath
174 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)