Hoppl v. Hoppl
359 N.E.2d 700, 40 N.Y.2d 993, 391 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3186
This text of 359 N.E.2d 700 (Hoppl v. Hoppl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoppl v. Hoppl, 359 N.E.2d 700, 40 N.Y.2d 993, 391 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3186 (N.Y. 1976).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, on the ground that, upon this record and the reasons assigned by the Appellate Division, the court does not find any abuse of discretion as a matter of law. Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Calkins v. Calkins
309 A.D.2d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
McGrath v. McGrath
174 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
359 N.E.2d 700, 40 N.Y.2d 993, 391 N.Y.S.2d 106, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoppl-v-hoppl-ny-1976.