Hopper v. Lisek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hopper v. Lisek

9 A.D.2d 770, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 770 (Hopper v. Lisek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopper v. Lisek, 9 A.D.2d 770, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by one of the beneficiaries named in a trust agreement (1) to compel one of the trustees to reconvey a parcel of real property in Queens County, a part of the trust res, pursuant to a provision in said agreement which required the trustees to reconvey on demand, and (2) to recover damages for the alleged breach of said agreement. The appeal is (a) from an order granting a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer and directing specific performance, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 661.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by one of the beneficiaries named in a trust agreement (1) to compel one of the trustees to reconvey a parcel of real property in Queens County, a part of the trust res, pursuant to a provision in said agreement which required the trustees to reconvey on demand, and (2) to recover damages for the alleged breach of said agreement. The appeal is (a) from an order granting a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer and directing specific performance, and (b) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 661.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 770, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopper-v-lisek-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack