Hopper v. Kemp

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hopper v. Kemp

225 S.E.2d 15, 236 Ga. 615, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 961

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 6, 1976

Docket30934

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 225 S.E.2d 15 (Hopper v. Kemp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopper v. Kemp, 225 S.E.2d 15, 236 Ga. 615, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 961 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case where the court hearing the petition ordered the trial court’s judgment vacated and required that the prisoner be reindicted and retried within a stated period of time.

The indictment was signed by the foreman of the grand jury but did not contain the names of the members of the grand jury who acted on such true bill. The habeas court held that while the prisoner could waive such defect the record in this case does not disclose that the prisoner himself waived this formal requirement of the indictment, either orally or in writing, prior to trial, and that such right could not be waived by the attorney for the prisoner without the prisoner’s consent.

Code § 27-701 prescribes the form of an indictment. Such language has not changed in over 100 years. See Horne v. State, 37 Ga. 80, 90 (1867). Nor have the requirements of Code § 27-1601 been amended, which require that defects as to form in indictments must be raised before trial.

In 1899 this court had for decision the question of whether with the consent of counsel, an indictment could *616 be amended prior to trial by adding the names of the members of the grand jury where through inadvertence the names were not originally included on the indictment. It was there held (Williams v. State, 107 Ga. 721 (33 SE 648)), that the defect was one of form only. The defect being one of form only cannot be raised after verdict. Accordingly the judgment of the habeas corpus court which held that any defect in an indictment in a capital felony case must be waived by the defendant and cannot be waived by counsel without the defendant’s consent or by going to trial without objection must be reversed. A defect as to form is waived by going to trial without objection.

Submitted March 16, 1976 Decided April 6, 1976. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Kirby G. Atkinson, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Bonn Anthony Kemp, pro se.

The judgment of the habeas corpus court requiring the prisoner to be reindicted and retried is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case where the court hearing the petition ordered the trial court’s judgment vacated and required that the prisoner be reindicted and retried within a stated period of time.

The indictment was signed by the foreman of the grand jury but did not contain the names of the members of the grand jury who acted on such true bill. The habeas court held that while the prisoner could waive such defect the record in this case does not disclose that the prisoner himself waived this formal requirement of the indictment, either orally or in writing, prior to trial, and that such right could not be waived by the attorney for the prisoner without the prisoner’s consent.

Code § 27-701 prescribes the form of an indictment. Such language has not changed in over 100 years. See Horne v. State, 37 Ga. 80, 90 (1867). Nor have the requirements of Code § 27-1601 been amended, which require that defects as to form in indictments must be raised before trial.

In 1899 this court had for decision the question of whether with the consent of counsel, an indictment could *616 be amended prior to trial by adding the names of the members of the grand jury where through inadvertence the names were not originally included on the indictment. It was there held (Williams v. State, 107 Ga. 721 (33 SE 648)), that the defect was one of form only. The defect being one of form only cannot be raised after verdict. Accordingly the judgment of the habeas corpus court which held that any defect in an indictment in a capital felony case must be waived by the defendant and cannot be waived by counsel without the defendant’s consent or by going to trial without objection must be reversed. A defect as to form is waived by going to trial without objection.

Submitted March 16, 1976 Decided April 6, 1976. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Kirby G. Atkinson, Staff Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Bonn Anthony Kemp, pro se.

The judgment of the habeas corpus court requiring the prisoner to be reindicted and retried is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 S.E.2d 15, 236 Ga. 615, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopper-v-kemp-ga-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack