Hopper v. City of Prattville

781 So. 2d 355, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 357, 2000 WL 1207345
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided August 25, 2000·No. 1991491·Published

Opinion

HOOPER, Chief Justice.

In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. (Hopper v. City of Prattville, 781 So.2d 346 (Ala.Crim.App.2000).) See § 32-5A-88, Ala.Code 1975; House v. State, 380 So.2d 940, 942-43 (Ala.1979) (stating the general rule as to what constitutes a material variance); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246, 252 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (if location is a material allegation, then it is material to the charge).

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, COOK, LYONS, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hopper v. City of Prattville, 781 So. 2d 355, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 357, 2000 WL 1207345 (Ala. 2000).

781 So. 2d 355 (Hopper v. City of Prattville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hopper v. City of Prattville
781 So. 2d 346 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2000)
Lunceford v. City of Northport
555 So. 2d 246 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
House v. State
380 So. 2d 940 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1979)