Hopper v. City of Prattville
This text of 781 So. 2d 355 (Hopper v. City of Prattville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In denying the petition for the writ of certiorari, we do not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. (Hopper v. City of Prattville, 781 So.2d 346 (Ala.Crim.App.2000).) See § 32-5A-88, Ala.Code 1975; House v. State, 380 So.2d 940, 942-43 (Ala.1979) (stating the general rule as to what constitutes a material variance); Lunceford v. City of Northport, 555 So.2d 246, 252 (Ala.Crim.App.1988) (if location is a material allegation, then it is material to the charge).
WRIT DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
781 So. 2d 355, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 357, 2000 WL 1207345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopper-v-city-of-prattville-ala-2000.