Hoppe Ex Rel. Hoppe v. Deese
This text of 61 S.E.2d 903 (Hoppe Ex Rel. Hoppe v. Deese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A master is civilly liable for an assault and battery by his servant on a third person if, and only if, it is committed while the servant is acting within the course and scope of his employment. According to the allegations of the complaint, the male defendant assaulted the feme plaintiff to carry out an independent and licentious purpose of his own, and not to accomplish the business mission entrusted to him by the corporate defendant. This being true, the ruling on the demurrer was correct; *699 for it appears upon tbe face of tbe complaint tbat tbe wrongful act of tbe male defendant was outside the scope of his employment. Robinson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 216 N.C. 322, 4 S.E. 2d 889; Robinson v. McAlhaney, 214 N.C. 180, 198 S.E. 647; Snow v. DeButts, 212 N.C. 120, 193 S.E. 224; Smith v. Cathey, 211 N.C. 747, 191 S.E. 505. Tbe judgment sustaining tbe demurrer is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E.2d 903, 232 N.C. 698, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoppe-ex-rel-hoppe-v-deese-nc-1950.