Hoppe Ex Rel. Hoppe v. Deese

61 S.E.2d 903, 232 N.C. 698, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 605
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1950·No. 524·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

EbviN, J.

A master is civilly liable for an assault and battery by his servant on a third person if, and only if, it is committed while the servant is acting within the course and scope of his employment. According to the allegations of the complaint, the male defendant assaulted the feme plaintiff to carry out an independent and licentious purpose of his own, and not to accomplish the business mission entrusted to him by the corporate defendant. This being true, the ruling on the demurrer was correct; *699 for it appears upon tbe face of tbe complaint tbat tbe wrongful act of tbe male defendant was outside the scope of his employment. Robinson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 216 N.C. 322, 4 S.E. 2d 889; Robinson v. McAlhaney, 214 N.C. 180, 198 S.E. 647; Snow v. DeButts, 212 N.C. 120, 193 S.E. 224; Smith v. Cathey, 211 N.C. 747, 191 S.E. 505. Tbe judgment sustaining tbe demurrer is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoppe Ex Rel. Hoppe v. Deese, 61 S.E.2d 903, 232 N.C. 698, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 605 (N.C. 1950).

61 S.E.2d 903 (Hoppe Ex Rel. Hoppe v. Deese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salley v. Petrolane, Inc.
764 F. Supp. 61 (W.D. North Carolina, 1991)
Wegner v. Delly-Land Delicatessen, Inc.
153 S.E.2d 804 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)
King v. Motley
62 S.E.2d 540 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)