Hopo Corp. v. Keller

798 So. 2d 889, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15713, 2001 WL 1359775
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-2622
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 798 So. 2d 889 (Hopo Corp. v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hopo Corp. v. Keller, 798 So. 2d 889, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15713, 2001 WL 1359775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, HOPO Corporation, seeks certiorari review of an order denying its motion to dissolve a lis pendens. See Archer v. Archer, 692 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Based on our decision in Marbin v. Cohen, 789 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we grant the petition as HOPO Corporation has not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action. We quash the trial court’s order denying the motion to dissolve HOPO’s lis pendens; the motion should have been granted.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loidl v. I & E GROUP, INC.
927 So. 2d 1016 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
798 So. 2d 889, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15713, 2001 WL 1359775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopo-corp-v-keller-fladistctapp-2001.