Hopmann v. Realty Exch., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hopmann v. Realty Exch., Inc.

568 S.W.3d 34

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106809

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 34 (Hopmann v. Realty Exch., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hopmann v. Realty Exch., Inc., 568 S.W.3d 34 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sharon D. Hopmann ("Plaintiff") appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Kaplan Associates, LLC on Plaintiff's claims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sharon D. Hopmann ("Plaintiff") appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Kaplan Associates, LLC on Plaintiff's claims for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hopmann-v-realty-exch-inc-moctapp-2018.